Ask The Chaplain

Ask The Chaplain

Monday, December 10, 2007

"Is Seed Faith Giving Biblically Accurate?"


The Heresy of Seed Faith Giving

2 Peter 2:1
But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
What do you think it means to deny the Lord? Many would say that any person or group that doesn’t believe that Jesus was the Son of God would be denying the Lord and that would be true enough. False religions like Islam and Hinduism would fall into this category. Most orthodox Christians would include the pseudo Christian cults like Jehovahs Witness’, Mormons, and others of that ilk. And they would be correct but are these the false teachers Peter is referring to here?
If you look closely you will see that Peter says these false teachers will be “among you”. Since he was writing to a group of born again, Spirit filled believers we must conclude that he is not talking about the obvious false religions or even pseudo Christian cults. The false teachers he is speaking of will be found within the Body of Christ.
Now how do you suppose that false teachers will get away with denying the Lord among a group of believers?
The word denying as it is used here is the Greek word arneomai {ar-neh'-om-ahee}. It is the same word used in Titus 1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him…. Used in these contexts, the word means to contradict.
So a teacher that contradicts the Lord is in fact denying Him. He may say that Jesus is Lord. He may speak right sounding words claiming to be born again and he may have the biggest Bible you’ve ever seen but if his works or teaching contradicts the words of Jesus he is denying Him.
For example, when Benny Hinn claimed in 1999 that Jesus would physically appear at one of his upcoming crusades he was contradicting the specific words of the Lord Jesus.
Math 24:23 -26
Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Behold, I have told you before Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.
By making the claim that Jesus would physically appear at one of his crusades Hinn contradicted (denied) the words of the Lord and proved himself to be a false prophet and false teacher according to 2 Peter 2:1
The so called principle of seed faith giving was first popularized by Oral Roberts almost 50 years ago. It proved to be so profitable to him that he essentially based his entire ministry on it. As with any other profitable venture others soon followed. Today it is used by virtually every “Faith” preacher, the majority of Christian television networks, and almost all TV preachers in general. It has even found its way into many mainstream and denominational churches.
How does seed faith giving work. It is loosely based (very loosely as we will see) on the parable of the sower found in Matthew 13, Mark 4, and Luke 8. Using the illustration of sowing seed, people are instructed that if they will give money to the church, the ministry, the TV network, the man of God, etc, God will multiply it back to them 30, 60, or 100 times more than they gave. In fact now days about all you ever hear about is the 100 fold return. The 30 and 60 fold returns have pretty much been dropped altogether.
That’s a pretty good deal wouldn’t you say? Give God $1 and get back $100. Give God $100 and get back $10,000. Give God $10,000 and get back a cool million. And not only that, but you can also sow money and get back other things. Things like salvation for relatives, healing for incurable diseases, and deliverance from various demonic influences! That’s right, all you have to do is send your seed (meaning money) to the man of God!
Is this really what the parable of the sower is all about. What do you think? Let’s examine this important parable.
Luke 8:4-8 NASB
When a large crowd was coming together, and those from the various cities were journeying to Him, He spoke by way of a parable: The sower went out to sow his seed; and as he sowed, some fell beside the road, and it was trampled under foot and the birds of the air ate it up. Other seed fell on rocky soil, and as soon as it grew up, it withered away, because it had no moisture. Other seed fell among the thorns; and the thorns grew up with it and choked it out. Other seed fell into the good soil, and grew up, and produced a crop a hundred times as great." As He said these things, He would call out, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear."
Jesus explains the parable
Luke 8:11 NASB
Now the parable is this: the seed is the word of God.
Now right here anybody with even a minimal level of reading comprehension should be able to see that this parable has nothing to do with money. The seed is the word of God. Even a brand new baby Christian should be able to look at this and say “I don’t think these fellows are teaching this correctly”
Let’s continue with Jesus’ explanation
Luke 8:12-15 NASB
Those beside the road are those who have heard; then the devil comes and takes away the word from their heart, so that they will not believe and be saved. Those on the rocky soil are those who, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no firm root; they believe for a while, and in time of temptation fall away. The seed which fell among the thorns, these are the ones who have heard, and as they go on their way they are choked with worries and riches and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to maturity. But the seed in the good soil, these are the ones who have heard the word in an honest and good heart, and hold it fast, and bear fruit with perseverance.
This parable is about what happens when the word of God is sown or revealed in the heart of a person. It may be the most important parable Jesus taught. Why do I say that? Because Jesus said this:
Mark 4;13
And he said unto them, Know ye not this parable? and how then will ye know all parables?
Jesus is saying that if you don’t understand this parable you won’t understand any of the parables he taught. This is a foundational teaching!
By misapplying the parable of the sower these false teachers do great damage to Gods people. First, by falsely claiming that God works like some kind of cosmic slot machine. But the real damage is in the fact that believers are robbed of the true meaning of this teaching.
The parable of the sower is at work every time Gods word is revealed to you. In fact it is at work right now in many of you who are reading this.
I know that many of you will read this and say “I don’t believe that. I don’t believe that my favorite preacher would preach a false message” You’ll reject what I’m saying. You’ll actually be rejecting the words of Jesus
The devil has come already to steal this word from you.
Some of you will hear what I say and receive it gladly. “ Glory to God” you’ll say, “preach it brother…. Hallelujah ” But you won’t take the time to really meditate on this word. You won’t really apply it.
And then a testing will come. Testing because of the word sown in your heart. A test to see if you really believe, trust in, rely on, adhere to what you claim to believe. You’ll be challenged. God Himself will allow that challenge, that test.
Will you pass the test? Or will you revert back to your traditional thinking?
And of course some of you will hear and believe but you won’t give this word the proper place in your life. You’ll think about it for a while. You’ll decide that it’s right but then you’ll get on with your life. You’ll get busy with your job, your family, your daily responsibilities and it will recede further and further into the recesses of your heart until it has no real value to you.
And the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches will have choked the truth out of your heart.
But I know too that some of you will hear this word and receive it. You’ll meditate on it. You’ll give it the proper priority in your life. When challenged you’ll stand and agree with it rather than contradict!
And you will have proven yourself to be good soil. You’ll produce fruit, becoming more and more Christ like in your life. You’ll become a disciple indeed.
John 8:31-32
Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
A little leaven leavens the whole lump
Paul said that evil men will wax worse and worse and so it is with false teaching. The false ideology behind the seed faith message has infected the church to such a degree that many never even question the idea that if you “have a need” you must “plant a seed”
But is that assumption theologically sound? Should we really plant a seed when we have a need?
During a recent telethon (beg-a-thon) Paul Crouch, founder of Trinity Broadcast Network explained that even God sowed a seed when He had a need.
That’s right God had a need. He’d lost His first family in Adam, Crouch explained, so God sowed His best seed, Jesus. Not only that, but God sowed in expectation. Just like we are taught to sow expecting a miracle, God sowed expecting a 100 fold return. He gave His son Jesus and got back many more sons and daughters. Proof positive that seed faith giving works!
Hogwash!
Does the Bible really teach that God had a need? Did God ever lose anything or anyone. Would you like God’s response to Mr. Crouch’s exhortation. Well look right here.
Psalm 50:9-12 NKJV
I will not take a bull from your house, Nor goats out of your folds. For every beast of the forest is Mine, And the cattle on a thousand hills. I know all the birds of the mountains, And the wild beasts of the field are Mine.
If I were hungry, I would not tell you; For the world is Mine, and all its fullness.
Or how about this verse Mr. Crouch
Math 3:9
And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
God is God. He is not a man having needs. He didn’t lose anything. All is His. If He were hungry He wouldn’t tell us. Isn’t that incredible!
It is the height of arrogance (or perhaps apostasy) to claim that God is anything like us. He is in no way dependent on us. We are dependent on Him. And herein lies the real heresy of the seed faith message.
It turns the doctrine of grace into a doctrine of works and thereby denies the finished work of the cross.
The seed faith message is a message of works, not grace. It says God cannot or will not act until we do something.
Would you like to know how to have God meet all your needs, even financial needs every time? Go to the words of Jesus.
Math 6:31-33
Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
What does Jesus say to do when you have a need? Does He say to sow a seed?
No, He says take no thought. He says don’t worry about material possessions. He says that the Father knows you have need of these things.
So, when a preacher says sow a seed after Jesus has said take no thought isn’t that preacher guilty of contradicting the Lord? Isn’t he in fact denying the Lord?
Of course Jesus doesn’t stop there. He tells us how to have our needs met. It’s simply, seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
How do we seek His kingdom and His righteousness? Well, Gods kingdom and His righteousness are revealed in the Gospel
Romans 1:16-17
For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by
faith.
The Gospel is defined in 1Cor 15:1-4.
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
The Gospel is the death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. It is this Gospel that is the power of God. It is in this Gospel that God’s righteousness is revealed. It is in this Gospel that your needs are met.
Eph 2:8-9
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Like many Christians you’ve probably read this scripture so many times you don’t even think about it any more. You’re probably saying “yes, praise God I know that I’m saved by grace, I know that I’m heaven bound but what’s that got to do with me paying my bills?”
The word saved in the Greek is the word sozo. It means literally to keep safe and sound, to rescue from danger or destruction, from injury or peril, to save a suffering one from perishing, to make well, heal, restore to health, to preserve one who is in danger of destruction, to save or rescue.
You see, to be saved means much more than just “go to heaven”. It means to be set at safety in the here and now. It means to be made safe in spirit, soul, and body. That would certainly include material things as well as eternal things wouldn’t it?
The death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus is the free gift of God. It is salvation (all needs met) to everyone who believes. It requires no work on our part. It requires no vows, no pledges, no seeds of faith. What it requires is simply belief.
To believe means more than mere mental assent. It means that we trust in, rely on, adhere to the fact that God has provided for all our needs when He raised Jesus from the dead. In other words we must refuse to contradict (deny) the words of the Lord!
2 Peter 1:3
According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue.
Gods divine power, that same power that raised Christ from the dead has (past tense) given to us all things that pertain to life and Godliness. All things means all things! All things that pertain to life would include finances to pay your bills!
God doesn’t want your money He wants your life.
The faith teachers like to suggest that you must make an exchange or a trade with God in order for Him to move on your behalf. You know what? They are right in principle but wrong in practice. The exchange is not material for material. It’s not give something to get something.
The exchange is your life for His. It’s your will for His will. It’s your desires for His desires. That’s the exchange. And that’s the only exchange God desires. It’s the only exchange He will honor.
A rich man came to Jesus one day and asked what he should do to have eternal life. Jesus told him to obey Gods commandments. When the man answered that he had been doing that all his life, Jesus told him there was one thing he lacked.
Mark 10:21
Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me
This passage is about seeking first the kingdom of God and His righteousness. It’s about what has priority in our lives.
Mark 10:22
And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.
The man chose material (temporal) wealth over eternal (true) life. He chose his will over Gods will.
What does it mean to “take up the cross”? It means to believe the gospel. To trust in, rely on, adhere to, the death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ, and our death, burial, and resurrection with Him !
That’s the exchange God is looking for!
Gal 2:20
I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
Paul understood the exchange. He understood that to trust in, rely on, and adhere to the Gospel (the cross) he had to enter into it himself.
Rom 6:4
Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Col 2:12
Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead
When we reckon ourselves dead to the world we are made alive in Christ Jesus. When we lose our lives, we gain real life!
Mark 8:35
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it.
Notice the next to last word in that scripture. That’s right, it’s the Greek word sozo again. To lose your life is to save it, to make it complete, to rescue it from destruction, injury, or peril. To be set at safety.
1Cor 15:1
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
The seed you sow is yourself.
John 12:24
Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.
When you enter into the death burial and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ you sow your life. And you sow it 100%. Not a tenth, not a seed, all of your life must be sown.
New Testament Giving
The New Testament model for giving is found in II Corinthians chapter 9. Paul here is exhorting the church in Corinth to fulfill an obligation to which they had earlier committed. The offering was being taken for the believers in Macedonia who were suffering great privation and affliction.
Notice if you will that the offering was to go to needy people, not to Pauls ministry . Paul was not taking up an offering for himself, or so that he could “reach the world for Christ” or build an orphanage, or stay on the air, or for any of the other reasons modern preachers give to extort money from Gods people.
II Cor 9:6-8
But this I say, He which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully. Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work:
This passage of scripture clearly equates financial giving with sowing seed but it does not validate the “principle” of seed faith giving.
First of all our giving should be directed primarily toward the poor and needy. Here’s an interesting scripture you’ll never hear from these seed faith preachers
Prov 22:16
He that oppresseth the poor to increase his riches, and he that giveth to the rich, shall surely come to want.|
Aren’t you giving to the rich when you send “seed” to these money preachers? They all live in million dollar homes, drive high dollar cars, wear expensive suits. That sounds pretty rich to me. This scripture says that by the very thing you are doing, you’re perpetuating your own lack!
Secondly we should give as we purpose in our hearts. Third we should give cheerfully, not out of need (or just because there is a need), and not because we feel we must give (out of necessity).
Here is the place where the doctrine of seed faith giving contradicts the word of God. Every preacher practicing seed faith giving first of all makes you feel that you must give (of necessity) before God can move on your behalf. But look again at what Paul said:
Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity
Now think about it. Think about how these preachers put pressure on you to give. They make emotional appeals. They make extravagant claims. They tell you that you must give in order to receive from God. If you don’t give (and I mean right now!) you’ll miss God, etc, etc, on and on, ad infinitum
Aren’t they contradicting the clear word of God? Aren’t they in fact denying the Lord who bought them?
The result of this model of giving is that we are promised that we will always have enough (always having all sufficiency in all things) for all the things that God asks us to do (to every good work).
This is in no way a promise or guarantee of worldly wealth. It is a promise that God will provide regardless of the circumstances in which we find ourselves.
Phil 4:11-12
Not that I speak in respect of want: for I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content. I know both how to be abased, and I know how to abound: every where and in all things I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need.
Now let’s look again at the proper object of our giving. This is important because wherever Jesus spoke of giving finances He spoke of giving alms. The word alms always means a gift of charity. This is giving specifically for the benefit of the poor.
When Jesus spoke to the rich young ruler what did he tell him to do?
Mar 10:21
Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
Jesus told him to give to the poor. He didn’t say give to my ministry. He didn’t say give at the temple. He said give to the poor. Jesus spoke may times of giving alms.
Mat 6:1
Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.
Luke 11:41
But rather give alms of such things as ye have; and, behold, all things are clean unto you.
Luke 12:33
Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth.
In the book of Acts we see the spiritual and physical benefits of giving alms.
Acts 10:1-2
There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, A devout man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.
Acts 10:4
And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.
God rewarded Cornelius (a gentile Roman soldier) with salvation for himself and his household because of his prayers and his alms (gifts to the poor).
How often are we taught today to give alms to the poor?
Now I know that these seed faith preachers make a pretense of giving to the poor. But how much of what they receive really go to the poorest among us? I can tell you that it is precious little. Many of the largest ministries take in millions of dollars each year and send a few thousand dollars per month to missionaries in third world countries.
Do you realize how few dollars it takes to feed and cloth the poor in the poorest nations, Many missionaries are thrilled to have a $2,000 or $3,000 per month donation from a major ministry. These missionaries are to be commended. For the most part they are doing a great work and doing it unto the “least of these” (Math 25:45)
But the seed faith preachers who make a show out of giving a relative pittance, that’s another matter. In fact the reason most of them give to missions at all is so that they can go to the mission once a year with their cameras to show their “partners” how they are feeding starving kids. This is a pure business decision. By showing pictures of them hugging poor third world kids they are able to deceive even more people into sending them money. It’s all a scam, a charade
Jesus tells us we shall know them by their fruit. Or by the results of their lives
Math 7:16
Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?


Here are some of the fruits of these seed faith preachers
Oral Roberts
"Here is a portrait of the real Oral Roberts, the man not too many of his admirers know. He dresses in Brioni suits that cost $500 to $1000; walks in $100 shoes; lives in a $250,000 house in Tulsa and has a million dollar home in Palm Springs; wears diamond rings and solid gold bracelets employees `airbrush' out of his publicity photos; drives $25,000 automobiles which are replaced every 6 months; flies around the country in a $2 million fanjet falcon; has membership, as does his son Richard, in `the most prestigious and elite country club in Tulsa,' the Southern Hills (the membership fee alone was $18,000 for each, with $130 monthly dues) and in `the ultra-posh Thunderbird Country Club in Rancho Mirage, California' (both father and son joined when memberships were $20,000 each--they are now $25,000); and plays games of financial hanky-panky that have made him and his family members independently wealthy (millionaires) for life. (When his daughter and son-in-law were killed, they left a $10 million estate!)" (Evangelist R.L. Sumner's review of Give Me that Prime- time Religion by Jerry Sholes) ed note numbers quoted here are from the mid to late 70’s
Paul and Jan Crouch
TBN Televangelists Buy $5,000,000 Home
LOS ANGELES TIMES, Nov.4,2001, page K15
Televangelists JAN and PAUL CROUCH of the Costa Mesa-based Trinity Broadcasting Network have purchased a Newport Beach house for close to $5 million, Orange County Realtors say.
The home was described as "a palatial estate with ocean and city views." The Crouches had been living in a smaller house in the same neighborhood.
The house they bought has six bedrooms, nine bathrooms, a billiard room, a climate-controlled wine cellar, a sweeping staircase and a crystal chandelier.
The three-story, nearly 9,500-square-foot house, which has an elevator, also has a six-car garage, a tennis court and a pool with a fountain.
The house is on slightly more than an acre. Jan Crouch had been wanting a bigger yard for her dogs, sources said.
Trinity Broadcasting, established in 1973, has more than 768 TV stations on the air worldwide. The Crouches oversee a $100-million-plus-a-year enterprise. Even so, faithful viewers are said to consider the couple, who are in their 60s and have been married since the 50's, as everyday folk.
Creflo Dollar
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Mar. 9, 2000
http://www.accessatlanta.com/partners/ajc/newsatlanta/dollar/main.html
The Rev. Creflo Dollar Jr. has unabashedly embraced his name by building a
religious empire on the message that his brand of piety leads to prosperity.
He drives a black Rolls-Royce, flies to speaking engagements across the
nation and Europe in a $5 million private jet and lives in a $1 million home
behind iron gates in an upscale Atlanta neighborhood.
Joel Osteen
The younger Osteen lives the life of prosperity that he preaches. A 2001 Real Estate Guide (http://north-valley.com/realestate_board/messages/157.html ) valued his home at $1,265,500.
Benny Hinn
What happened to Hinn's promised healing center?
06/23/2002
By STEVE McGONIGLE / The Dallas Morning News
Evangelist Benny Hinn dazzled an overflowing Reunion Arena three years ago with plans to bring a touch of Lourdes to Las Colinas.
The flamboyant Pentecostal preacher offered the crowd a multimedia tour of his proposed $30 million shrine to faith healing and solicited donations to pay for it. The start of construction was imminent, he told followers.
Mr. Hinn's "World Healing Center" never materialized. After a few months, he stopped talking about the project. His tax-exempt ministry did not have to give a public accounting of how much money he raised or how it was spent, and it didn't. …..Last year, a subsidiary led by Mr. Hinn began work on a $3 million "parsonage" overlooking the Pacific Ocean south of Los Angeles.
Paula White
http://www.cephasministry.com/news_pulse_9.2003.html#anchor760
Supporters of Randy and Paula White say they have no problem with their displays of wealth. Tampa - When preachers Randy and Paula White bought the $2.2 million red-brick house on Bayshore Boulevard last month, they were already thinking ahead to November. "We always do a 'Table in the Wilderness' Thanksgiving dinner for the homeless," says Randy White, senior pastor at Without Walls International Church. "Now that we have the space to do it in our own, we'd like to find a way to bus them here for the party." A spacious yard is attached to the 8,000-spare-foot, five-bedroom English manor home. And the Whites' church has its own buses. IN HIS SERMON "PROSPERITY OR POVERTY," White announced he and his wife had bought this house. Their taste in cars reflects their substantial income.: She drives a Mercedes sedan, he a Cadillac Escalade. The side of Randy White's car is emblazoned with "Big Daddy" - nickname bestowed by inner-city kids served by church's many missions. Randy and Paula White married in 1988 and in 14 years they claim 15,000 members and offer 250 ministries from job training for welfare recipients to a teen rock club. Randy is a fifth generation preacher. Much of their money comes from tax dollars through the faith-based initiative.
Joyce Meyer
From Fenton to fortune in the name of God
Carolyn TuftandBill Smith
©2003, St. Louis Post-Dispatch
11/15/2003
Joyce Meyer says God has made her rich.
Everything she has came from Him: the $10 million corporate jet, her husband's $107,000 silver-gray Mercedes sedan, her $2 million home and houses worth another $2 million for her four children — all blessings, she says, straight from the hand of God…...
A penchant for nice things
Meyer is fond of nice things and is willing to spend for them. From an $11,000 French clock in the ministry's Fenton headquarters to a $105,000 Crownline boat docked behind her vacation home at Lake of the Ozarks, it's clear her tastes run more to Perrier than to tap water. ….
The ministry's headquarters is a three-story jewel of red brick and emerald-color glass that, from the outside, has the look and feel of a luxury resort hotel.
Built two years ago for $20 million, the building and grounds are postcard perfect, from manicured flower beds and walkways to a five-story lighted cross.The building is decorated with religious paintings and sculptures, and quality furniture. Much of it, Meyer says, she selected herself.
A Jefferson County assessor's list offers a glimpse into the value of many of the items: a $19,000 pair of Dresden vases, six French crystal vases bought for $18,500, an $8,000 Dresden porcelain depicting the Nativity, two $5,800 curio cabinets, a $5,700 porcelain of the Crucifixion, a pair of German porcelain vases bought for $5,200.
The decor includes a $30,000 malachite round table, a $23,000 marble-topped antique commode, a $14,000 custom office bookcase, a $7,000 Stations of the Cross in Dresden porcelain, a $6,300 eagle sculpture on a pedestal, another eagle made of silver bought for $5,000, and numerous paintings purchased for $1,000 to $4,000 each.
Inside Meyer's private office suite sit a conference table and 18 chairs bought for $49,000. The woodwork in the offices of Meyer and her husband cost the ministry $44,000.
In all, assessor's records of the ministry's personal property show that nearly $5.7 million worth of furniture, artwork, glassware, and the latest equipment and machinery fill the 158,000-square-foot building.
As of this summer, the ministry also owned a fleet of vehicles with an estimated value of $440,000. The Jefferson County assessor has been trying to get the complex and its contents added to the tax rolls but has failed.Stylish sports cars and a plane
Meyer drives the ministry's 2002 Lexus SC sports car with a retractable top, valued at $53,000. Her son Dan, 25, drives the ministry's 2001 Lexus sedan, with a value of $46,000. Meyer's husband drives his Mercedes-Benz S55 AMG sedan.
"My husband just likes cars," Meyer said.
The Meyers keep the ministry's Canadair CL-600 Challenger jet, which Joyce Meyer says is worth $10 million, at Spirit of St. Louis Airport in Chesterfield. The ministry employs two full-time pilots to fly the Meyers to conferences around the world.
These are just a few of the most prominent seed faith preachers. Now I ask you do you honestly believe these people are living the crucified life. Have they forsaken all to follow Jesus. Have they forsaken the world or do they love the things of this world?
Joyce Meyer says her husband drives a $100,000 Mercedes because he “just likes cars”. But the Apostle John says
1John 2:15-16
Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
Do you think that a $100,000 Mercedes qualifies as a thing that is “of the world”? How about that $30,000 malachite table Joyce bought for the office, or the $11,000 French clock, or the $105,000 boat at the $500,000 lake house, or the …. well, you get the idea.
Look again at the words of John. He says that if any man (person) love the world (and by extension the things of the world ) the love of the Father is not in him.
Do you believe the Bible? Do you believe the Bible is contradictory? Do you believe that what God says applies to some people but not to others? Do you believe that Joyce Meyer and her husband have the love of God in their hearts?
Paula and Randy White need an 8,000 square foot, $2 million home so that they can bus poor people in once a year and feed them. Feeding the poor is a commendable thing to do. But Jesus says:
Math 6:1-2
Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
When the Whites announce that they will be feeding the homeless at Thanksgiving are they not “sounding a trumpet” Are they not doing their alms “to be seen of men”. According to Jesus doesn’t this make them hypocrites?
We could continue with this exercise but I think you get the point. Are these peoples lives and words in agreement with the words of Jesus and the apostles or are they contradicting (denying) Him?
You’ll know them by their fruit
Now I know that many of you will now accuse me of judging. Well, you’re correct, I am judging these hypocrites and false teachers. I am judging them the way we as Christians are instructed to judge.
Math 7:15-16
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Math 7:20
Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them
Math 7:21-23
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Jesus says we will know them “by their fruits” In other words we will know them by what their lives produce. Not by what they say but by what they do . Talk is cheap. Don’t tell me, show me!
Tell me this. Who do you think Jesus was talking about when he said these words “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven.
He certainly wasn’t talking about the unsaved. He wasn’t talking about the cults and false religions. Hindus don’t prophesy in Jesus name and Muslims don’t cast out devils.
If you are honest with yourself (and if you haven’t let the devil steal the word that this teaching has been sowing in your heart) you must acknowledge that the people He is talking about are the very teachers and preachers we see on TBN and Daystar every day. These wolves in sheeps clothing that tell us that if we have a need we must sow a seed. These false prophets who deny (contradict) the Lord who bought them. These so called great men and women of God (and their followers) who “through covetousness.. with feigned words make merchandise of you” (2Peter 2:3)
These are the ones Jesus says shall not enter in. Why? Because only those who do the will of the Father shall enter.
Obey God not man
Have you been a follower of any of these false prophets? Have you been “sowing your seed” faithfully. Have you been giving sacrificially to the man or woman of God? |
Have you received your hundred fold return?
I don’t mean have you had some occasional victories here and there. I want to know have you received your hundred fold return. Has it worked for you like it seems to work for them? Are you living in a $2 million dollar home? Do you have a $100,000 Mercedes. Do you fly around the country in a private jet?
Well, why not? I hear these people all the time say that God is no respecter of persons (Rom 2:11) They say that what He did for one He will do for another. So again I ask, where is your Mercedes, and your $5 million estate?
Are you honest enough to ask yourself and your heavenly Father why you’re still following these people when it’s obviously not working in your life?
Do you really want the answer? Now before you go any further you should know that once you receive the truth you are responsible for it.
2 Peter 2:1-3
But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.
And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.
And so we are back to the scripture with which we started. False teachers are among us. They are bringing in damnable heresies like seed faith giving. In doing so they deny or contradict the Lord who bought them. They are destined for swift destruction.
And many of you are following their pernicious (destroying) ways. And because of this the true Gospel is ridiculed throughout our society.
It is by using the sin of covetousness that they make merchandise (exploit or use) of you.
This covetousness is in your heart. You follow them because you desire the things they promise. Even when you see the scriptures that condemn them you ignore them , you evade them, you rationalize in your mind that the scripture doesn’t really mean what it say. You have itching ears and are heaping up to yourself teachers after your own lusts
You are guilty before God and you will share in the swift destruction reserved for these false prophets if you don’t repent.
Math 10:41
He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward.
Do not be deceived. God is not mocked. If you receive (take hold of, take up with) a false prophet you will share in that false prophets reward.
If you are convicted by this word you need to repent. Repent means to change your mind. It means to change direction. It is an act of will.
Ask your heavenly Father to deliver you from the covetousness in your heart. Ask Him to deliver you from the love of worldly things. Ask Him to show you the truth as it is written in the word without adding to it the traditions of men.
Take up your cross today. Deny yourself. Deny your fleshly desires and humble yourself before the Most High God. Enter into the death burial and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. Reckon yourself dead. Lay your life on the altar. Present yourself as a living sacrifice.
Don’t wait. Now is the acceptable time. Repent and believe the Gospel before it is too late.
Rev 18:4
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

Steve Lumbley 2004 www.apostasywatch.com

This article is greatly appreciated. Visit www.apostasywatch.com for more articles pertaining to this issue.

How Can The Church Help The Mentally Ill?


Ministering to the Mentally Ill and the emotionally Distraught


The magnitude of mental illness in this country is staggering. According to the Surgeon General, one in every five Americans experiences a mental disorder in any given year and half of all Americans have such disorders at some time in their lives. These illnesses of the brain affect all of us, regardless of age, gender, economic status or ethnicity. Nearly every person sitting in the pews has been touched in some way by mental illness. And yet individuals and families continue to suffer in silence or stop coming to their faith community because they are not receiving the support they so desperately need. They become detached from their faith community and their spirituality, which is an important source of healing, wholeness and hope in times of personal darkness. THERE IS HOPE!

The Church MUST remember these things about the mentally Ill:

1. Welcome the chronically mentally ill into the life of the local congregation. God CAN use the mentally ill, everyone has a divine purpose!
2. Support the families of the chronically mentally ill in ways that alleviate their heavy burdens of care. Often they are treated with equal distain.
3. Enhance the skills of congregational caregivers in their ministry to the chronically mentally ill.

4. Mental Illness is as much a disease as a physical illness; only in rare cases is demon possession the problem, mental illness can be genetic, from emotional trauma, or from a traumatic injury.


Our Ministry Arises Out of Our Faith:
1. We believe that all members of the human race, the chronically mentally ill not less than others, they have been redeemed by the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ. We invite them into the fellowship of faith with us.
2. We believe that all people, including the chronically mentally ill, baptized into the community of faith, need to be nurtured by the Gospel within the framework of their special needs.
3. We recognize that the local congregation is a community of God's people, one of whose hallmarks is mutual care and support.




Facts About Mental Illness and Resources For Ministering to the Mentally Ill

Numbers
Mental illness (brain disorders) strikes one in five families in the United States, according to estimates of the National Institutes of Mental Health. This estimate will tell you the probable number of mental illness cases in your church.
Care Ministry
Ministry to the mentally ill is generally less intentional and consistent than care for physical illness. Remember mental illness can strike ANYONE at anytime!
Communication
It is not easy to read the thought world of the mentally ill when loose thought association moves the speaker from one subject to another without logical connection.
Delusions, inner voices, deep withdrawal can make conversation and relationships all but impossible.
Conventional spiritual care is on occasion distorted and disconnected from its Gospel content by the mentally ill person.
Consequence
Communication is broken off; ministry and relationship, while desired, appear beyond reach.
In the absence of the new knowledge of mental illness as brain disease, older theories: the family's emotional climate, parental relationships, or inheritance persist.
The mentally ill are identified by their disease - he is a schizophrenic; she is manic-depressive--in the minds of congregation members. People do not recognize their talents, accomplishments, or the family name.

What if I Become Sick?



If you are a Christian and you are suffering with an illness (Mental or Physical) of some kind be encouraged. God has not forsaken you. I know it may feel like it but He hasn’t. I have received great comfort from Psalm 13, a Psalm of David. This Psalm has taught me that one of the major problems with suffering is dealing with anger and bitter feelings towards God Himself. We have been taught the new wave message of “positive confession”, but what God really desires from us is an honest confession. Out of all the books in the Bible, the one that has delivered me the most is the Psalms. To many believers Psalms is just a collection of praise song. Many theologians look at Psalms, Proverbs, and especially Ecclesiastes as books without much doctrinal weight or value. How wrong they are! Through all of my trials and tribulations, I have been able to find a point of contact and understanding by reading Psalms. My favorite Psalm is Psalm 13.

After you read it you may wonder, “How can this depressing psalm be someone’s favorite?” This is the most honest prayer in the scriptures. David asked God a question, “How long will you forget me Lord?” This honesty in prayer helped me realize that God wants to hear everything we have to say, the good and the bad. David felt abandoned by God. I can identify with this feeling. For the last three years I have been battling sickness. I have been poked, prodded, and examined. I have had Scarlet Fever. I have been misdiagnosed with Osteomylitis (bone infection). I was on an IV for 8 weeks; my lungs were scanned and X-rayed to find growths. I have granulomas (lesions) in different parts of my body that causes severe pain in my joints and my eyes, and the cause of all of this is an incurable illness called Sarcoidosis. I began to recite Psalm 13 as though I wrote it. The good news is found in the 5th and 6th verses. David obviously recalled how the Lord had been merciful and kind to him in the past. David’s was to continue to trust in the mercy of God and hope in the loving-kindness of the Lord. I feel that many of our prayers go unanswered because we are not honest with God. However David felt, that what he expressed to the Master. This is one of the keys to being a man after God’s own heart.”



13:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. How long wilt thou forget me, O LORD? for ever? how long wilt thou hide thy face from me? (David felt like the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had forsaken him. At times if we are honest, we feel the same way.)
2 How long shall I take counsel in my soul, having sorrow in my heart daily? how long shall mine enemy be exalted over me? (David was going through extreme emotional distress. Chronic illness can cause this kind of emotional trauma in ones life.)
3 Consider and hear me, O LORD my God: lighten mine eyes, lest I sleep the sleep of death; (David is not afraid to let the Lord know how distraught he is, and at the same time he makes his supplications known to God. I believe God honors an honest confession more than a positive one.)
4 Lest mine enemy say, I have prevailed against him; and those that trouble me rejoice when I am moved.
5 But I have trusted in thy mercy; my heart shall rejoice in thy salvation. (David was able to trust in the Lord’s mercy because he had a relationship with Him. David although discouraged was able to rebound because of his love for the Lord)
2 I will sing unto the LORD, because he hath dealt bountifully with me. (One of the keys to getting through a stressful season is to give God praise through it all)

This Psalm has helped me get through my most painful moments because it reminds me that God has and will continue to deliver me. We must trust in God’s sovereignty as well as His power. Trusting in His ability to know what is best for us takes more faith than running around “naming and claiming” everything. I was at a revival and someone asked me, “Have I claimed my healing yet?” I was really disturbed at this question; I realized that this person really did not know the Lord or me very well. If they knew me they would know I love the Lord with all my heart and whether I am healed or not I still love Him. If they really knew me they would know that I believe in the healing power of God but I also trust in His timetable and sovereignty. Don’t be discouraged saints of God; the Lord is on your case. The grace of God can keep us through all of our trials and tribulations no matter how severe they might be. One of the beautiful things about the Bible is that the characters were just like us. Men and women in the Bible suffered sickness, loss of life, and abuses. I believe God allowed every story in the Bible to be graphic and uncut because we need to see the hand of God in every situation, both good and bad. I love the rawness of the Old Testament, people were not all good and everyone wasn’t blessed all the time. People that were good suffered and people that were bad received mercy. God is sovereign and in control even when it looks like He isn’t.


9 And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
10 Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong. (II Cor.12)


About five years I visited a woman from my church in the hospital, she suffered from Lupus and Cancer. Just one of these diseases is enough to destroy someone’s life. I asked her how she was feeling and the usual small talk. Before I left she looked at me and said something that made me well up with tears. She said, “The thing that hurts to most is that the saints of God think I did something wrong because of my condition.” This is what I call the “Spirit of Job’s Friends”; it is wrecking havoc in the Body of Christ. It is causing those that need love, a hug, and understanding to be shunned by the ones that should minister to them. The only time Job’s friends did any good was when they silently sat with him while he suffered. As soon as they opened their mouth, they hurt him. Telling someone that is sick things like, “You need faith!”, “Repent”, or “Stop claiming the sickness” is cold and insensitive. There are times when God renders His judgment on sinful ways, but in many cases the illness has nothing to do with sin. Let’s examine the Word.

15 The Lord then answered him, and said, Thou hypocrite, doth not each one of you on the sabbath loose his ox or his ass from the stall, and lead him away to watering?
16 And ought not this woman, being a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan hath bound, lo, these eighteen years, be loosed from this bond on the sabbath day?
12 And when he had said these things, all his adversaries were ashamed: and all the people rejoiced for all the glorious things that were done by him. (Luke 18)

This woman was identified as a daughter of Abraham, meaning she was a believer! Jesus did not mention any of her sins. Was she sinless? Is anyone? Of course not, Jesus healed this woman for two reasons, 1. She was a daughter of Abraham 2. That He might be glorified. What does this mean? If you are a child of God suffering, Jesus sees your pain and will do something about it. Jesus understands pain because he felt it too!


2 And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?
3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.
4 I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
3 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world. (John 9)

The disciples were just as dense as we are today! They ask the question, “Who sinned?” Well if he was born blind, what sin did he commit? Did he kick his mother in the womb? Truthfully all of us are born sinners! (Psalm 51). Why would God punish him for his parent’s sin? I’m glad Jesus answered their question. Jesus said “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents.” I am a firm believer that many today are not healed because those that minister forget that the glory belongs to the Lord of Host. If you watch the so-called great men and women of God today, they act like they are the healers and not Christ alone. God was very angry with Job’s friends! Why? Because they falsely accused Job and misrepresented God, They were also self-righteous as they bombarded Job with innuendo and accusation. The best thing you can do for someone that suffering is pray for them and keep you mouth shut. A hug goes a lot further in most cases than a lecture.

15 Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep.
16 Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits. (Romans 12)

These two verses say it all! But focus on verse 16, “condescend to men of low estate.” This means stay meek and humble in your character, because the same calamity could happen to you.

23 Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised;)
22 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: (Heb.10)

6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.
2 Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.
“Even Jesus got depressed!”

WHAT WAS PAUL’S "SPLINTER IN THE FLESH"?




The Apostle Paul tells us in II Cor. 12:7 that, "... there was given to me a splinter in the flesh..."

What was that "splinter?" Can we know?

Two categories have been suggested as the possible explanation: (1) A physical deficiency or disease, (2) A moral or spiritual weakness.

The Scriptural evidence usually given for the first category (that of a disease or physical deficiency) is:

Gal. 4:15 -- "For I am testifying to you, that, if possible, gouging out your eyes, you would give them to me."

Gal. 6:11 -- "Lo! With what size letters I write to you with my own hand!"

Clearly, these two verses show strong evidence that Paul had a problem with his eyesight.

Suggesting that someone might give their eyes to Paul and that Paul wrote with his own hand in large letters, obviously suggests that Paul had a deficiency in his eyesight. But, was this deficiency in his eyes, the "splinter in his flesh" mentioned in II Cor. 12:7?

Hardly! A deficiency in eyesight can not compare with many of Paul’s more severe trials: "By Jews five times I got forty save one. Thrice am I flogged with rods, Once am I stoned, thrice am I shipwrecked ..." Etc., etc. (II Cor. 11:24)

Romans, chapter seven, is generally used to show that Paul’s splinter in the flesh may have been a spiritual or moral sin:

Rom. 7:8 -- "Now Sin, getting an incentive through the precept, produces in me all manner of coveting."

Rom. 7:18-20 -- "For I am aware that good is not making its home in me (that is, in my flesh), for to will is lying beside me, yet to be effecting the ideal is not. For it is not the good that I will that I am doing, but the evil that I am not willing, this I am putting into practice."

It does seem possible to conclude from these verses that, although, Paul didn’t commit sins willingly, he was aware that there was, nonetheless, sin in his flesh. He plainly states, that, "Yet now it is no longer I who am effecting it, but Sin making its home in me" (Verse 17).

So is it possible that "Sin making its home in Paul" was his "splinter in the flesh?"

Hardly! Just as surely as Paul completely comprehended that we are never totally free from sin in our flesh, he also knew the solution to lingering sins--"GRACE" (Verse 25). I believe that Paul was a spiritual giant (I’m talking relatively, among men). I doubt that John the Baptist, or Daniel, or even Joseph, were Paul’s superiors in any way.

But, is it conceivable that Paul had a moral sin that he couldn’t overcome? Possibly. But if he did, it was something only he was knowledgeable of. Could he have coveted power and recognition? Only he would have known of it. It certainly was nothing that showed up in his ministry to the nations.

It was Paul himself, that said: "Be not deceived. Neither paramours, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor catamites, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards; no revilers, no extortioners shall be enjoying the allotment of God’s kingdom" (I Cor. 6:9-10). Surely no one would suggest that Paul himself could be guilty of even one the above sins, after giving this stern warning to one of the weakest assemblies in the Body of Christ.

When Paul told the Phillipians, "...that you may become blameless and artless, children of God, flawless, in the midst of a generation crooked and perverse..." I don’t think he added: "By the way, however, do as I say; not as I do." I am positive that Paul’s spiritual standards were at least as high as the standards he set for his followers, which, of course, were very high!

Else how could he command them through the years to be imitators of himself?

I Cor. 4:16 -- "I am entreating you, then, become imitators of me."

I Cor. 11:1 -- "Become imitators of me, according as I also am of Christ."

I Thes. 1:6 -- "And you became imitators of us and of the Lord, receiving the word in much affliction with joy of holy spirit, so that you became MODELS to all the believers in Macedonia and in Achaia."

Phil. 3:17 -- "Become imitators together of me, brethren, and be noting those who are walking thus, according as you have us for a MODEL ..."

Paul knew his walk was exemplary in every way, or he would not have entreated the saints so often to be imitators of him. I do not believe that Paul’s splinter in the flesh was a moral sin or spiritual shortcoming.

SUFFICIENT FOR YOU IS MY GRACE

When Paul entreated the Lord thrice that this splinter should withdraw from him, the Lord protested by saying, "Sufficient for you is My grace..." (II Cor. 12:9). It has been suggested that "grace always answers to sin." Many times that is the case, however, not always. Grace is not always used in Scripture as the "remedy for sin." The word "grace" appears over two hundred times in the Greek Scriptures. Many times "grace" is used in a wide variety of gifts, favors, and gratuities that are not directly related to sin.

A point can also be made of the fact that this splinter was not something that could be found in Paul (such as a sin), but something that was rather "...GIVEN to me..." (Ver. 7). Paul doesn’t specifically say that it was given him by God, but then again, Who else? So since it was God who gave Paul this splinter, it is hard to believe that God would have given Paul a SIN. We don’t need to be given sins. We are constituted so spiritually weak, that we sin as easily as breathing. God hardly has to give us sins--we are sinning machines. But, Paul’s splinter was "given" to him by God.

WITHDRAW FROM ME

Another telling word is found in Paul’s entreaty: "For this I entreat the Lord thrice, that it should withdraw from me.

The Greek word translated "withdraw" is aphistemi = FROM-STAND. Only a creature of intelligence and mobility can possibly "withdraw" from someone.

Withdrawal is used fifteen times in the Greek Scriptures, and always refers to people or creatures of mobility. "Withdrawal" is never used in connection with inanimate objects. Objects are normally "removed" or "taken away." They do not "withdraw." When Paul asked God to have "it" withdraw from him, the "it" was not an "object or thing,", but a "creature."

PAUL’S BIZARRE LIFE

No one in the history of the world has ever lived a life as Paul did. Read II Cor. 11:22-28. Jails, blows, deaths, beatings, shipwrecks, stoning, and constant dangers of every kind, day after day, year after year, decade after decade! Who can comprehend such a life? Who could ever endure such a life? After the first scourging and the second shipwreck, I believe I would throw in the towel.

Some years ago, I meditated on the incredible hardships that Paul endured while taking the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the nations. Clearly, (in the relative world), time and chance and circumstance, would never produce the plethora of catastrophes Paul faced daily.

Imagine this. You return home from a three-day business trip to Puerto Rico. In shock, your wife greets your tattered body at the door. "What happened to you?" she asks.

"Well dear, after disembarking in Puerto Rico I was dragged back an alley were several men beat and robbed me. They even took my clothing. I stumbled back to the main street in my underwear, where police promptly arrested me for indecent exposure. They took me to jail. After verifying my identity and passage on the ship, they let me go the next day. I acquired a new credit card at a local bank. A small clinic charged me $3500 to clean and bandage a few flesh wounds. I didn’t call you for fear you would panic.

I didn’t attend my business meetings. I lost a big account for my company. I went to the beach to relax and heal. The second day I took a swim and was stung by several jellyfish. I was again taken to a doctor. The third day I boarded ship to return to Miami. Midway home, the ship sank. There were sharks everywhere, but thank God, the Coast Guard arrived in a few hours."

All would agree, that that would be just "too much." Not for Paul, however.

THE TRIALS OF PAUL

Paul’s suffered:

weariness
jails
blows
deaths
thirty-nine lashes
flogged with rods
stoned
shipwrecked
day & night in swamp
journeys
dangers of rivers
dangers of robbers
dangers of my race
dangers of the nations
dangers in the city
dangers in wilderness
dangers in the sea
dangers/false brethren
toil and labor
vigils
famine and thirst
fasts
cold and nakedness more exceedingly
more exceedingly
inordinately
often
five times
three times
one time
three times
one time
often
often
often
often
often
often
often
often
often
often
often
often
often
often

Paul remembers lashes, rods, stoning, shipwrecks, and a day in the swamp, by numbers-- five, three, one, three, and one. All of the rest of his trials and sufferings are mentioned as "often." How often? Obviously, so often (certainly five times or more), as to not remember. (The "often" after "vigils" refers back, I believe, to all the categories of "dangers," which are all in the plural, and we know from Scripture itself, that those things happened "often.")

This leaves two categories (weariness and jails) that were "more exceedingly." "More exceedingly" than what? or who? More exceedingly than: "...the paramount apostles" (Ver. 5).

TRANSCENDENCE VS. INORDINATELY

We are now left with just one category in a class all of its own. "... in blows inordinately ..." (Verse 23).

Only the trial of "blows" does Paul label "inordinately." Why? Is there something unique about this particular category of trial (blows)? Yes there is!

Fourteen years prior to writing II Corinthians, Paul speaks of being: "...snatched away to the third heaven...into paradise and hears ineffable declarations, which it is not allowed a man to speak" (II Cor. 12: 2-4). How big of a deal was this heavenly revelation to Paul? It was a giant, big deal. Paul said that it was a transcendent revelation (Verse 7).

Paul acknowledged that unless God would apply a counterbalance to him, he would surely, "...be lifted UP..." (Verses 7 and 8). The revelation was that "transcendent"!

"Transcendence" is translated from the Greek word [h]uper bol e’ = OVER-CAST.

Here are some of the ways it is used in Scripture:

"Yet be zealous for the greater graces. And still I am showing you a path, suited to transcendence" ( I Cor. 12:31).

"Now we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the transcendence of the power may be of God and not of us" (II Cor. 4:7).

"For the momentary lightness of our affliction is producing for us a transcendently transcendent eonian burden of glory..." (Ver. 17).

If we notice carefully, these occurrences of "transcendency" are either attributed to God, or to things yet future. Only Paul actually experienced "transcendency" in this life. Because of this privilege presented to Paul, God must now humble him and bring him back down to earth.

Paul’s explanation of what his splinter in the flesh really was is quite clear:

"Wherefore also, lest I should be lifted up by the transcendence of the revelations, there was given me a splinter in the flesh, a messenger of Satan, that he may be buffeting me, lest I may be lifted up"

"For this I entreat the Lord thrice, that it should withdraw from me. And He protested to me, ‘Sufficient for you is My grace, for My power in Infirmity is being perfected" (II Cor. 12:7-9).

Notice, "...there was given me a splinter in the flesh, a messenger of Satan..." The "splinter" is the "messenger." It is exactly the same as "...there is one God, the Father..." The "Father" IS the "one God." The splinter IS the messenger. But wait; there’s more.

So the "messenger" is the "splinter." What was the messenger to do to Paul? Answer: "...that he may be buffeting me..." (Ver. 8).

"Buffeting" comes from the Greek word kol aph iz’o = CHASTEN-FROM. It means: "to rap with the fist" (Strong’s Greek Dictionary p. 43. Webster’s, buffet, (bufit) n. a blow. "A blow." Now where have we seen that before?

II Cor. 11:23--"...in blows inordinately..."

Again, Webster’s New World Dictionary, blow n. 1 a hard hit, as with the fist 2 a sudden attack 3 a sudden calamity; shock.

Webster’s Twenteth-Century Dictionary gives us an even broader definition: buffeting, n. 1. A striking with the hands. 2. A succession of blows; strife; opposition; adversity.

So now we have a good idea of the meaning of this word "buffet"--A hard hit (especially to the face), sudden attack, sudden calamity, shock, succession of blows, strife, opposition, and adversity. Why would Paul call all this pain and calamity "a splinter"? A splinter seems rather mild compared to the miseries that define buffet. That’s because Paul is not speaking of intensity when he speaks of a "splinter," but rather the incessantness of a splinter. The pain and aggravation is constant. It never goes away. It plagues one with every move, until the splinter is removed.

The idiomatic expression "a splinter in my flesh" is still in popular usage. We alter it slightly to "a thorn in my flesh" or "a thorn in my side." We say things like: "Jack as been a thorn in my side ever since he came to work here."

The pain that Paul suffered from his hundreds of trials was obviously very intense. However, an analogy of a "splinter in the flesh" is not a description of intensity, but rather of its uninterrupted, nonstop, persistence. Paul suffered by buffeting for fourteen years prior to his writing II Corinthians, and probably another eleven years after writing II Corinthians, seeing that God never did remove it from him ("Sufficient for you is My grace...").

Imagine twenty-five years of such suffering by being buffeted by a messenger of Satan. Why so much? Why so severe? Why so long?

Remember, Paul’s revelations were transcendent. It is, therefore, necessary that his humiliation must be in accord with his exaltation. Is there a negative word that answers, in kind, to the word "transcendence"? Yes. It’s the word "inordinately"!

Let’s first look at the positive: Webster’s, transcend, 1. To go beyond the limits of; exceed 2. To surpass; excel. This is the positive side of [h]uperbole.

Now the negative: I like Webster’s New World Student’s Dictionary: inordinate, adj. too many or too much; excessive.

How revealing these words are. Paul’s privilege in revelations was so high (maybe almost too high) that God had to answer this exaltation with the opposite of "transcendence." Something that will humble him. Something "excessive." Something that is almost "too much." Inordinately!

God’s answer and remedy to "transcendence" is "inordinately."

Here’s proof: The word "transcendence" and the word "inordinately" are both translated from the same Greek word, "[h]uper bal’lo"!

Paul’s splinter was a messenger of Satan. His purpose was to buffet Paul. Buffeting was the category that Paul said happened to him inordinately, which answers in kind to Paul’s transcendence in revelations. So Paul lived for twenty-five years, being "hit hard," "suddenly," constantly and incessantly (like an aggravating "splinter in the flesh").

We have to understand that Paul could not live normally, by just expecting a setback or trial from time to time as circumstances would allow. No. Paul traveled in foreign lands for years, fully conscious of the fact that this appointed messenger of Satan was always there, like a sniper in the dark, ready to suddenly pounce on Paul with blows of every description and severity of pain and agony. And how often did these things happen to Paul? Almost too often, and too much--INORDINATELY!

Did Paul ever get a bad attitude over his "inordinate" blows? No. He said: "Wherefore I delight in infirmities, in outrages, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses, for Christ’s sake, for, whenever I may be weak, then I am powerful" (II Cor. 12:10).

"For the momentary [for Paul this was twenty-five years!] lightness of our afflictions [read the list of Paul’s trials again] is producing for us a transcendently, transcendent eonian burden of glory..." (II Cor. 4:17). Whenever we get down, it’s because we fail to comprehend our future--transcendently, transcendent glory! Paul was given a foretaste to encourage him, and also to assure us that these things are real--they belong to us with our future in Christ.

The Lord's Supper - By J.C. Ryle


The Lord's Supper
by
J. C. Ryle
(1816-1900)

"A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread
and drinks of the cup" (1 Corinthians 11:28)


The words which form the tittle of this paper refer to the subject of vast
importance. That subject is the Lord's Supper.

Perhaps no part of the Christian religion is so thoroughly misunderstood as
the Lord's Supper. On no point have there been so many disputes, strifes,
and controversies for almost 1800 years. On no point have mistakes done so
much harm. The very ordinance which was meant for our peace and profit has
become the cause of discord and the occasion of sin. These things ought not
to be!

I make no excuse for including the Lord's Supper among the leading points of
"practical" Christianity. I firmly believe that ignorant views or false
doctrine about this ordinance lie at the root of some of the present
divisions of professing Christians. Some neglect it altogether; some
completely misunderstand it; some exalt it to a position it was never meant
to occupy, and turn it into an idol. If I can throw a little light on it,
and clear up the doubts in some minds, I will feel very thankful. It is
hopeless, I fear, to expect that the controversy about the Lord's Supper will
ever be finally closed until the Lord comes. But it is not too much to hope
that the fog and mystery and obscurity with which it is surrounded in some
minds, may be cleared away by plain Bible truth.

In examining the Lord's Supper I will be content with asking four practical
questions, and offering answers to them.

I. Why was the Lord's Supper ordained?

II. Who ought to go to the Table and be communicants?

III. What may communicants expect from the Lord's Supper?

IV. Why do many so-called Christians (church-going unbelievers) never go to
the Lord's Table?

I think it will be impossible to handle these four questions fairly,
honestly, and impartially, without seeing the subject of this paper more
clearly, and getting some distinct and practical ideas about some leading
errors of our day. I say "practical" emphatically. My chief aim in this
volume is to promote practical Christianity.

I. In the first place, "why was the Lord's Supper ordained?"

It was ordained for the continual remembrance of the sacrifice of the death
of Christ, and of the benefits which we thereby receive. The bread which in
the Lord's Supper is broken, given, and eaten, is meant to remind us of
Christ's body given on the cross for our sins. The wine which is poured out
and received, is meant to remind us of Christ's blood shed on the cross for
our sins. He that eats that bread and drinks that wine is reminded, in the
most striking and forcible manner, of the benefits Christ has obtained for
his soul, and of the death of Christ as the hinge and turning point on which
all those benefits depend.

Now, is the view here stated the doctrine of the New Testament? If it is
not, forever let it be rejected, cast aside, and refused by men. If it is,
let us never be ashamed to hold it close, profess our belief in it, pin our
faith on it, and steadfastly refuse to hold any other view, no matter who
teaches it. In subjects like this we must call no man master. It matters
little what great theologians and learned preachers have thought fit to put
forth about the Lord's Supper. If they teach more than the Word of God
contains they are not to be believed.

I take down my Bible and turn to the New Testament. There I find no less
than four separate accounts of the first appointment of the Lord's Supper.
Matthew, Mark, Luke, and Paul, all four describe it: all four agree in
telling us what our Lord did on this memorable occasion. Only two tell us
the reason why our Lord commanded that His disciples were to eat the bread
and drink the cup. Paul and Luke both record the remarkable words, "Do this
in remembrance of me." Paul adds his own inspired comment: "For whenever you
eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he
comes." (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:25-26). When Scripture speaks so
clearly, why can't men be content with it? Why should we mystify and
confuse a subject which in the New Testament is so simple? The "continual
remembrance of Christ's death" was the one grand object for which the Lord's
Supper was ordained. He that goes further than this is adding to God's Word,
and does so to the great peril of his soul.

Now, is it reasonable to suppose that our Lord would appoint an ordinance for
so simple a purpose as "remembering His death?" It most certainly is. Of
all the facts in His earthly ministry none are equal in importance to that of
His death. It was the great settlement for man's sin, which had been
appointed in God's promise from the foundation of the world. It was the
great redemption of almighty power, to which every sacrifice of animals, from
the fall of man, continually pointed. It was the grand end and purpose for
which the Messiah came into the world. It was the cornerstone and foundation
of all man's hopes of pardon and peace with God. In short, Christ would have
lived, and taught, and preached, and prophesied, and performed miracles in
vain, if He had not "crowned it all by dying for our sins as our Substitute
on the Cross!" His death was our life. His death was the payment of our
debt to God. Without His death we would have been the most miserable of all
creatures. No wonder that an ordinance was specially appointed to remind us
of our Savior's death. It is the one thing which poor, weak, sinful man
needs to be continually reminded.

Does the New Testament authorize men to say that the Lord's Supper was
ordained to be a sacrifice, and that in it Christ's literal body and blood
are present under the forms of bread and wine? Most certainly not! When the
Lord Jesus said to the disciples, "This is my Body," and "this is my Blood,"
He clearly meant, "This bread in my hand is an symbol of my Body, and this
cup of wine in my hand contains a symbol of my Blood." The disciples were
accustomed to hear Him use such language. They remembered His saying, "The
field is the world, and the good seed stands for the sons of the kingdom.
The weeds are the sons of the evil one" (Matthew 13:38). It never entered
into their minds that He meant to say He was holding His own body and His own
blood in His hands, and literally giving them His literal body and blood to
eat and drink. Not one of the writers of the New Testament ever speaks of
the Lord's Supper as a sacrifice, or calls the Lord's Table an altar, or even
hints that a Christian minister is a sacrificing priest. The universal
doctrine of the New Testament is that after the one offering of Christ there
remains no more need of sacrifice.

If any one believes that Paul's words to the Hebrews, "We have an altar"
(Hebrews 13:10), are a proof that the Lord's table is an altar, I remind him
"Christians have an altar where they partake. That altar is Christ our Lord,
who is Altar, Priest, and Sacrifice, all in One."

Throughout the Communion Service the one idea of the ordinance continually
pressed on our attention is that of a "remembrance" of Christ's death. As to
any presence of Christ's natural body and blood under the forms of bread and
wine, the clear answer is that "the natural body and blood of Christ are in
heaven, and not here." Those Roman Catholics who delight in talking of the
"altar," the "sacrifice," the "priest," and the "real presence" in the
Lord's Supper, would do well to remember that they are using language which
is entirely non-Biblical.

The point before us is one of vast importance. Let us lay hold upon it
firmly, and never let it go. It is the very point on which our Reformers had
their sharpest controversy with the Roman Catholics, and went to the stake,
rather than give way. Sooner than admit that the Lord's Supper was a
sacrifice, they cheerfully laid down their lives. To bring back the doctrine
of the "real presence," and to turn the communion into the Roman Catholic
"mass," is to pour contempt on our Martyrs, and to upset the first principles
of the Protestant Reformation. No, rather, it is to ignore the plain
teaching of God's Word, and do dishonor to the priestly office of our Lord
Jesus Christ. The Bible teaches expressly that the Lord's Supper was
ordained to be "a remembrance of Christ's body and blood," and not an
offering. The Bible teaches that Christ's substituted death on the cross was
the perfect sacrifice for sin, which never needs to be repeated. Let us
stand firm in these two great principles of the Christian faith. A clear
understanding of the intention of the Lord's Supper is one of the soul's best
safeguards against the delusions of false doctrine.

II. In the second place, let me try to show "who ought to receive the Lord's
Supper?" What kind of persons were meant to go to the Table and receive the
Lord's Supper?

I will first show who ought not to be partakers of this ordinance. The
ignorance which prevails on this, as well as on every part of the subject, is
vast, lamentable, and appalling. If I can contribute anything that may throw
light upon it, I will feel very thankful. The principal giants whom John
Bunyan describes, in "Pilgrim's Progress," as dangerous to Christian
pilgrims, were two, Pope and Pagan. If the good old Puritan had foreseen the
times we live in, he would have said something about the giant Ignorance.

(a) It is not right to urge all professing Christians to go to the Lord's
Table. There is such a thing as fitness and preparedness for the ordinance.
It does not work like a medicine, independently of the state of mind of those
who receive it. The teaching of those who urge all their congregation to
come to the Lord's Table, as if the coming must necessarily do every one
good, is entirely without warrant of Scripture. No, rather, it is a teaching
which is calculated to do immense harm to men's souls, and to turn the
reception of the Lord's Supper into a mere form. Ignorance can never be the
mother of acceptable worship, and an ignorant communicant who comes to the
Lord's Table without knowing why he comes, is altogether in the wrong place.
"A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the
cup."--"recognizing the body of the Lord,"--that is to understand what the
elements of bread and wine represent, and why they are appointed, and what is
the particular use of remembering Christ's death--is an essential
qualification of a true communicant. God commands all people everywhere to
repent and believe the Gospel (Acts 17:30), but He does not in the same way,
or in the same manner, command everybody to come to the Lord's Table. No:
this thing is not to be taken lightly, or carelessly! It is a solemn
ordinance, and solemnly it ought to be used.

(b) But this is not all. Sinners living in open sin, and determined not to
give it up ought never to come to the Lord's Table. To do so is a positive
insult to Christ, and to pour contempt on His Gospel. It is nonsense to
profess we desire to remember Christ's death, while we cling to the accursed
thing which made it needful for Christ to die. The mere fact that a man is
continuing in sin is clear evidence that he does not care for Christ, and
feels no gratitude for the offer of redemption.

The ignorant Roman Catholic who goes to the priest's confessional and
receives absolution, may think he is fit to go to the Roman Catholic mass,
and after mass may return to his sins. He never reads the Bible, and knows
no better! But the professing Christian who habitually breaks any of God's
commandments, and yet goes to the Lord's Table, as if it would do him good
and wipe away his sins, is very guilty indeed. So long as he chooses to
continue his wicked habits he cannot receive the slightest benefit from the
Lord's Table, and is only adding sin to sin. To carry unrepented sin to the
Lord's Table, and there receive the bread and wine, knowing in our own hearts
that we and wickedness are yet friends, is one of the worst things man can
do, and one of the most hardening to the conscience. If a man must have his
sins, and can't give them up, let him by all means stay away from the Lord's
Supper. There is such a thing as "eating and drinking in an unworthy manner"
and to our own "judgment." To no one do these words apply so thoroughly as to
an unrepentant sinner.

(c) But I am not done yet. Self-righteous people who think that they will
be saved by their own works, have no business to come to the Lord's Table.
Strange as it may sound at first, these persons are the least qualified of
all to receive the Lord's table. They may be outwardly correct, moral and
respectable in their lives, but so long as they trust in their own goodness
for salvation they are entirely in the wrong place at the Lord's Supper. For
what do we declare at the Lord's Supper? We publicly profess that we have no
goodness, righteousness, or worthiness of our own, and that all our hope is
in Christ.

We publicly profess that we are guilty, sinful, corrupt, and naturally
deserve God's wrath and condemnation. We publicly profess that Christ's
merit and not our's, Christ's righteousness and not our's is the only cause
why we look for acceptance with God. Now what has a self-righteous man to do
with an ordinance like this? Clearly nothing at all.

One thing at any rate, is very clear: a self-righteous man has no business to
receive the Lord's Supper. The Communion Service of the Church bids all
communicants declare that "they do not presume to come to the Table trusting
in their own righteousness, but in God's numerous and great mercies." It
tells them to say, "We are not worthy so much as to gather up the crumbs
under Your table," "the memory of our sins is grievous to us; the burden of
them is intolerable." How many self-righteous professing Christians can ever
go to the Lord's Table and take these words into his mouth, is beyond my
understanding! It only shows that many professing Christians use the "forms"
of worship without taking the trouble to consider what they mean.

The plain truth is that the Lord's Supper was not meant for dead souls, but
for living ones. The careless, the ignorant, the willfully wicked, the self-
righteous, are no more fit to come to the Lord's Table than a dead corpse is
fit to sit down at a king's feast. To enjoy a spiritual feast we must have a
spiritual heart, and taste, and appetite. To suppose that the Lord's Table
can do any good to an unspiritual man, is as foolish as to put bread and wine
into the mouth of a dead person. The careless, the ignorant, and the
willfully wicked, so long as they continue in that state, are utterly unfit
to come to the Lord's Supper. To urge them to partake is not to do them good
but harm. The Lord's Supper is not a converting or justifying ordinance. If
a man goes to the Table unconverted or unforgiven, he will be no better when
he comes away (actually worse due to the associated judgments for coming
unworthily).

But, after all, the ground having been cleared of error, the question still
remains to be answered--Who are the sort of persons who ought to receive the
Lord's Supper? I answer that by saying, people who have "examined themselves
to see whether they have truly repented of their former sins, steadfastly
purposing to lead a new life--have a true faith in God's mercy through
Christ, with a thankful remembrance of His death--they are in love with all
men." In a word, I find that a worthy communicant is one who possesses three
simple marks and qualifications--repentance, faith, and love. Does a man
truly repent of sin and hate it? Does a man put his trust in Jesus Christ as
his only hope of salvation? Does a man live in love towards others? He that
can truly answer each of these questions, "I do," he is a man that is
Scripturally qualified for the Lord's Supper. Let him come boldly. Let no
barrier be put in his way. He comes up to the Bible standard of
communicants. He may draw near with confidence, and feel assured that the
great Master of the banquet is not displeased.

Such a man's repentance may be very much imperfect. Never mind! Is it real?
Is he truly repentant? His faith in Christ may be very weak. Never mind!
Is it real? A penny is as much true currency as is a one hundred dollar
bill. His love may be very defective in quantity and degree. Never mind!
Is it genuine? The grand test of a man's Christianity is not the quantity of
holiness he has, but whether he has any all.

The first twelve communicants, when Christ Himself gave the bread and wine,
were weak indeed--weak in knowledge, weak in faith, weak in courage, weak in
patience, weak in love! But eleven of them had something about them which
outweighed all defects: they were real, genuine, sincere, and true.

Forever let this great principle be rooted in our minds--the only worthy
communicant is the man who has demonstrated repentance toward God, faith
toward our Lord Jesus Christ, and practical love toward others. Are you that
man? Then you may draw near to the table, and take the ordinance to your
comfort. Anything less than this I dare not change in my standard of a
communicant. I will never encourage someone to receive the Lord's Supper who
is careless, ignorant, and self-righteous. I will never tell anyone to keep
away till he is perfect, and to wait till his heart is as unruffled as an
angel's. I will not do so, because I believe that neither my Master nor His
Apostles would have done so. Show me a man that really feels his sins,
really leans on Christ, really struggles to be holy, and I will welcome him
in My Master's name. He may feel weak, erring, empty, feeble, doubting,
wretched, and poor. But what does that matter? Paul, I believe, would have
received him as a right communicant, and I will do likewise.

III. In the third place, let us consider "what benefit communicants may
expect to get by receiving the Lord's Supper."

This is a point of grave importance, and one on which many mistakes abound.
On no point, perhaps, connected with this ordinance are the views of
Christians so vague and indistinct and undefined.

One common idea among men is that "receiving the Lord's Supper must do them
some good." Why, they can't explain. What good, they can't exactly say. But
they have a loose general notion that it is the right thing to be a
communicant, and that somehow or other it is of value to their souls! This
is of course nothing better than ignorance. It is unreasonable to suppose
that such communicants can please Christ, or receive any real benefit from
what they do. If there is any principle clearly laid down in the Bible about
any act of religious worship, it is this that it must be with understanding.
The worshiper must at least understand something about what he is doing.
Mere bodily worship, unaccompanied by mind or heart, is utterly worthless.
The man who eats the bread and drinks the wine, as a mere matter of form,
because it is the "right" thing to do, without any clear idea of what it all
means, derives no benefit. He might just as well stay at home!

Another common idea among men is that, "taking the Lord' Supper will help
them get to heaven, and take away their sins." To this false idea you may
trace up the habit in some churches of going to the Lord's Table once a year,
in order, as an old farmer once said, "to wipe off the year's sins." To this
idea again, you may trace the too common practice of sending for a minister
in time of sickness, in order to receive the ordinance before death. Yes,
how many take comfort about their relatives, after they have lived a most
ungodly life, for no better reason than this, that they took the Lord's
Supper when they were dying! Whether they repented and believed and had new
hearts, they neither seem to know or care. All they know is that "they took
the Lord's Supper before they died." My heart sinks within me when I hear
people resting on such evidence as this.

Ideas like these are sad proofs of the ignorance that fills the minds of men
about the Lord's Supper. They are ideas for which there is not the slightest
warrant in Scripture. The sooner they are cast aside and given up, the
better for the Church and the world.

Let us settle it firmly in our minds that the Lord's Supper was not given to
be a means either of justification or of conversion. It was never meant to
give grace where there is no grace already, or to provide pardon when pardon
is not already enjoyed. It cannot possibly provide what is lacking with the
absence of repentance to God, and faith toward the Lord Jesus Christ. It is
an ordinance for the penitent, not for the impenitent, for the believing, not
for the unbelieving, for the converted, not for the unconverted. The
unconverted man, who fancies that be can find a "shortcut" to heaven by
taking the Lord's Supper, without treading the well-worn steps of repentance
and faith, will find to his cost one day, that he is totally deceived. The
Lord's Supper was meant to increase and help the grace that a man has, but
not to impart the grace that he does not have. It was certainly never
intended to make our peace with God, to justify, or to convert.

The simplest statement of the benefit which a truehearted communicant may
expect to receive from the Lord's Supper, is the strengthening and refreshing
of our souls--clearer views of Christ and His atonement, clearer views of all
the offices which Christ, fills as our Mediator and Advocate, clearer views
of the complete redemption Christ has obtained for us by His substituted
death on the cross, clearer views of our full and perfect acceptance in
Christ before God, fresh reasons for deep repentance for sin, fresh reasons
for lively faith--these are among the leading returns which a believer may
confidently expect to get from his attendance at the Lord's Table. He that
eats the bread and drinks the wine in a right spirit, will find himself drawn
into closer communion with Christ, and will feel to know Him more, and
understand Him better.

(a) Right reception of the Lord's Supper has a "humbling" effect on the
soul. The sight of the bread and wine as emblems of Christ's body and blood,
reminds us how sinful sin must be, if nothing less than the death of God's
own Son could make satisfaction for it, or redeem us from its guilt. Never
should we be so "clothed with humility," as when we receive the Lord's
Supper.

(b) Right reception of the Lord's Supper has a "cheering" effect on the soul.
The sight of the bread broken, and the wine poured out, reminds us how full,
perfect, and complete is our salvation. Those vivid emblems remind us what
an enormous price has been paid for our redemption. They press on us the
mighty truth, that believing on Christ, we have nothing to fear, because a
sufficient payment has been made for our debt. The "precious blood of
Christ" answers every charge that can be brought against us. God can be
"just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus"
(Romans 3:26).

(c) Right reception of the Lord's Supper has a "sanctifying" effect on the
soul. The bread and wine remind us how great is our debt of gratitude to our
Lord, and how thoroughly we are bound to live for Him who died for our sins.
They seem to say to us, "Remember what Christ has done for you, and ask
yourself whether there is anything too great to do for Him."

(d) Right reception of the Lord's Supper into hearts, has a restraining
effect on the soul. Every time a believer receives the bread and the wine he
is reminded what a serious thing it is to be a Christian, and what an
obligation is laid on him to lead a consistent life. Bought with such a
price as that bread and wine call to his recollection, ought he not to
glorify Christ in body and spirit, which are His? The man that goes
regularly and intelligently to the Lord's Table finds it increasingly hard to
yield to sin and conform to the world.

Such is a brief account of the benefits which a right hearted communicant may
expect to receive from the Lord's Supper. In eating that bread and drinking
that cup, such a man will have his repentance deepened, his faith increased,
his knowledge enlarged, his habit of holy living strengthened. He will
realize more of the "real presence" of Christ in his heart. Eating, that
bread by faith, he will feel closer communion with the body of Christ.
Drinking that wine by faith, he will feel closer communion with the blood of
Christ. He will see more clearly what Christ is to him, and what he is to
Christ. He will understand more thoroughly what it is to be "one with
Christ, and Christ one with him." He will feel the roots of his soul's
spiritual life watered, and the work of grace in his heart established, built
up, and carried forward. All these things may seem and sound like
foolishness to a natural man, but to a true Christian these things are light,
and health, and life, and peace. No wonder that a true Christian finds the
Lord's Supper a source of blessing!

Remember, I do not pretend to say that all Christians experience the full
blessing of the Lord's Supper, which I have just attempted to describe. Nor
do I say that the same believer will always find his soul in the same
spiritual frame, and always receive the same amount of benefit from the
ordinance. But I boldly say this: you will rarely find a true believer who
will not say that he believes the Lord's Supper is one of his best helps and
highest privileges. He will tell you that if he were deprived of the Lord's
Supper on a regular basis he would find the loss of it a great detriment to
his soul. There are some things of which we never know the value of till
they are taken from us. So I believe it is with the Lord's Supper. The
weakest and humblest of God's children gets a blessing from this ordinance,
to an extent of which he is not aware.

IV. In the last place, I have to consider "why it is that so many so-called
Christians (false believers) never come to the Lord's Supper."

It is a simple matter of fact, that myriads of persons who call themselves
Christians never come to the Table of the Lord. They would not endure to be
told that they deny the faith, and are not in communion with Christ. When
they worship, they attend a place of Christian worship; when they hear
religious teaching, it is the teaching of Christianity; when they are
married, they use a Christian service. Yet all this time they never come to
the Lord's Supper! They often live on in this state of mind for many years,
and to all appearance are not ashamed. They often die in this condition
without ever having received the ordinance, and yet profess to feel hope at
the last, and their friends express a hope about them. And yet they live and
die in open disobedience to a plain command of Christ! These are simple
facts. Let any one look around him, and deny them if he can.

Now why is this? What explanation can we give? Our Lord Jesus Christ's last
injunctions to His disciples are clear, plain, and unmistakable. He says to
all, "Eat, drink: do this in remembrance of Me." Did He leave it to our
discretion whether we would obey His injunction or not? Did He mean that it
was not significant whether His disciples did or did not keep up the
ordinance He had just established? Certainly not. The very idea is absurd,
and one certainly never dreamed of in apostolic times. Paul evidently takes
it for granted that every Christian would go to the Lord's Table when it was
available. A class of Christian worshipers who never came to the Table, was
a class whose existence was unknown to him. What, then, are we to say of
that number which fail to receive the Lord's Supper, unabashed, unhumbled,
not afraid, not the least ashamed? Why is it? How is it? What does it all
mean? Let us look these questions fairly in the face, and endeavor to give
an answer to them.

(1) For one thing, many fail to go to the Table because they are utterly
careless and thoughtless about religion, and ignorant of very first
principles of Christianity.

They go to church, as a matter of form, but they neither know, nor care
anything about what is done at church! The faith of Christ has no place
either in their hearts, or heads, or consciences, or wills, or
understandings. It is a mere affair of "words and names," about which they
know no more than Festus or Gallio. There were very few such false
Christians in Paul's times, if indeed there were any. There are far too many
in these last days of the world. They are the dead-weight of the Churches,
and the scandal of Christianity. What such people need is light, knowledge,
grace, a renewed conscience, a changed heart. In their present state they
have no part of Christ; and dying in this state they are thrown into hell.
Do I wish them to come to the Lord's Supper? Certainly not, till they are
converted. No one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born again.

(2) For another thing, many false Christians do not receive the Lord's
Supper because they know they are living in the habitual practice of some
sin, or in the neglect of some Christian duty.

Their conscience tells them so long as they live in this state, and do not
turn away from their sins, they are unfit to come to the Table of the Lord.
Well: they are so far quite right! I wish no man to be a communicant if he
cannot give up his sins. But I warn these people not to forget that if they
are unfit for the Lord's Supper in that condition they will be lost
eternally. The same sins which disqualify them for the ordinance, most
certainly disqualify them for heaven. Do I want them to come to the Lord's
Supper as they are? Certainly not! But I do want them to repent and be
converted, to cease to do evil, and to break off from their sins. Forever
let it be remembered that the man unfit for the Lord's Supper is unfit to
die.

(3) For another thing, some are not communicant because they fancy it will
add to their responsibility.

They are not, as many, ignorant and careless about religion. They even
attend church regularly and listen to the preaching of the gospel. But they
say they dread coming to the Lord's Table and making a confession and a
profession. They fear that they might afterwards fall away, and bring
scandal on the cause of Christianity. They think it wisest to be on the safe
side, and not commit themselves at all. Such people would do well to
remember that if they avoid responsibility of one kind by not coming to the
Lord's Table, they incur responsibility of another kind, quite as grave, and
quite as injurious to the soul. They are responsible for open disobedience
to a command from of Christ. They are shrinking from doing that which their
Master continually commands His disciples--confessing Him before men. No
doubt it is a serious step to come to the Lord's Table and receive the bread
and the wine. It is a step that none should take lightly and without self-
examination. But it is "no less a serious step to walk away and refuse the
ordinance," when we remember Who invites us to receive it, and for what
purpose it was appointed! I warn the people I am now dealing with to be
careful what they are doing. Let them not flatter themselves that it can
ever be a wise, a prudent, a safe line of conduct to neglect a plain command
of Christ. They may find at length, to their cost, that they have only
increased their guilt and forsaken their mercies.

(4) For another thing, some false Christians stay away from the Lord's
Supper because they believe they are not yet worthy.

They wait and stand still, under the mistaken notion that no one is qualified
for the Lord's Supper unless he feels within him something like perfection.
They pitch their idea of a communicant so high that they despair of attaining
to it. Waiting for inward perfection they live, and waiting for it they die.
Now such persons would do well to understand that they are completely
mistaken in their estimate of what "worthiness" really is. They are
forgetting that the Lord's Supper was not intended for unsinning angels, but
for men and women subject to weakness, living in a world full of temptations,
and needing mercy and grace every day they live.

A sense of our own utter unworthiness is the best worthiness that we can
bring to the Lord's Table. A deep feeling of our own entire indebtedness to
Christ for all we have and hope for, is the best feeling we can bring, with
us. The people I now have in view ought to consider seriously whether the
ground they have taken up is defensible, and whether they are not standing in
their own light. If they are waiting till they feel in themselves perfect
hearts, perfect motives, perfect feelings, perfect, repentance, perfect love,
perfect faith, they will wait forever. There never were such communicants in
any age--certainly not in the days of our Lord and of the Apostles--there
never will be as long as the world stands. No, rather, the very thought that
we feel literally worthy, is a symptom of secret self-righteousness, and
proves us unfit for the Lord's Table in God's sight. Sinners we are when we
first come to the throne of grace--sinners we will be till we die; converted,
changed, renewed, sanctified, but sinners still (though not like before--sin
is not the pattern of a believer's new life). In short, no man is really
worthy to receive the Lord's Supper who does not deeply feel that he is a
"miserable sinner."

(5) In the last place, some object going to the Lord's Table because they
see others partaking who are not worthy, and not in a right state of mind.

Because others eat and drink unworthily, they refuse to eat and drink at all.
Of all the reasons taken up by those refusing to come to the Lord's Supper to
justify their own neglect of Christ's ordinance, I must plainly say, I know
none which seems to me so foolish, so weak, so unreasonable, and so
unscriptural as this. It is as good as saying that we will never receive the
Lord's Supper at all! When will we ever find a body of communicants on earth
of which all the members are converted and living perfect lives? It is
setting up ourselves in the most unhealthy attitude of judging others. "Who
are you that you judge another person?" "What is that to you? You must
follow me" (John 21:22). It is depriving ourselves of a great privilege
because others profane it and make a bad use of it. It is pretending to be
wiser than our Master Himself. It is taking up ground for which there is no
warrant in Scripture. Paul rebukes the Corinthians sharply for the
irreverent behavior of some of the communicants; but I cannot find him giving
a single hint that when some came to the Table unworthily, others ought to
draw back or stay away. Let me advise the non-communicants I have now in
view to beware of being wise above that which was written. Let them study
the parable of the Wheat and Tares, and mark how both were to "grow together
until the harvest" (Matthew 13:30).

Perfect Churches, perfect congregations, perfect bodies of communicants, are
all unattainable in this world of confusion and sin. Let us covet the best
gifts, and do all we can to check sin in others; but let us not starve our
ownselves because others are ignorant sinners, and turn their food into
poison. If others are foolish enough to eat and drink unworthily, let us not
turn our backs on Christ's ordinance, and refuse to eat and drink at all.

Such are the five common excuses why myriads in the present day, though
professing themselves Christians (but they are not), never come to the Lord's
Supper. One common remark may be made about them: there is not a single
reason among the five which deserves to be called "good," and which does not
condemn the man who gives it. I challenge anyone to deny this. I have said
repeatedly that I want no one to come to the Lord's Table who is not properly
qualified. But I ask those who stay away never to forget that the very
reasons they assign for their conduct are their condemnation. I tell them
that they stand convicted before God of either being very ignorant of what a
communicant is, and what the Lord's Supper is; or else of being persons who
are not living right, and are unfit to die. In short, to say, I am a non-
communicant, is as good as saying one of three things--I am living in sin,
and cannot come--I know Christ commands me, but I will not obey Him--I am an
ignorant man, and do not understand what the Lord's Supper means."

I know not in what state of mind this book may find the reader of this paper,
or what his opinions may be about the Lord's Supper. But I will conclude the
whole subject by offering to all some warnings, which I venture to think are
highly required by the times.

(1) In the first place, "do not neglect" the Lord's Supper.

The man who coolly and deliberately refuses to use an ordinance which the
Lord Jesus Christ appointed for his profit, may be very sure that his soul is
in a very wrong state. There is a judgment to come; there is, an account to
be rendered of all our conduct on earth. How any one can look forward to
that day, and expect to meet Christ with comfort and in peace, if he has
refused all his life to commune with Christ at His Table, is a thing that I
cannot understand. Does this hit home to you? Be careful what you are
doing.

(2) In the second place, "do not receive the Lord's Supper carelessly,"
irreverently, and as a matter of form.

The man who goes to the Lord's Table, and eats the bread and drinks the wine,
while his heart is far away, is committing a great sin, and robbing himself
of a great blessing. In this, as in every other means of grace, every thing
depends on the state of mind in which the ordinance is used. He that draws
near without repentance, faith, and love, and with a heart full of sin and
the world, will certainly be nothing better, but rather worse. Does this hit
home to you? Be careful what you are doing.

(3) In the third place, "do not make an idol" of the Lord's Supper.

The man who tells you that it is the first, foremost, chief, and principal
precept in Christianity, is telling you that which he will find it hard to
prove. In the great majority of the books of the New Testament the Lord's
Supper is not even named. In the letter to Timothy and Titus, about a
minister's duties, the subject is not even mentioned. To repent and be
converted, to believe and be holy, to be born again and have grace in our
hearts--all these things are of far more importance than to be a communicant.
Without them we cannot be saved. Without the Lord's Supper we can. Are you
tempted to make the Lord's Supper override and overshadow everything in
Christianity, and place it above prayer and preaching? Be careful. Pay
attention what you are doing.

(4) In the fourth place, "do not use the Lord's Supper irregularly."

Never be absent when the Lord's Supper is administered. Make every effort to
be in attendance. Regular habits are essential to the maintenance of the
health of our bodies. Regular use of the Lord's Supper is essential to the
well-being of our souls. The man who finds it a burden to attend on every
occasion when the Lord's Table is spread, may well doubt whether all is right
within him, and whether he is ready for the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. If
Thomas had not been absent when the Lord appeared the first time to the
assembled disciples, he would not have said the foolish things he did.
Absence made him miss a blessing. Does this hit home to you? Be careful
what you are doing.

(5) In the fifth place, "do not do anything to bring discredit" on your
profession as a communicant.

The man who after attending the Lord's Table runs into sin, does more harm
perhaps than any sinner. He is a walking sermon on behalf of the devil. He
gives opportunity to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme. He helps to keep
people away from Christ. Lying, drinking, adulterous, dishonest, passionate
communicants are the helpers of the devil, and the worst enemies of the
Gospel. Does this hit home to you? Be careful what you are doing.

(6) In the last place, "do not despair" and be cast down, if with all your
desires you do not feel that you get a lot of good from the Lord's Supper.

Very likely you are expecting too much. Very likely you are a poor judge of
your own state. Your soul's roots may be strengthening and growing, while
you think you are not growing. Very likely you are forgetting that earth is
not heaven, and that here we walk by sight and not by faith, and must expect
nothing perfect. Lay these things to heart. Do not think harsh things about
yourself without cause.

To every reader into whose hands this paper may fall, I commend the whole
subject of it as deserving of serious and solemn consideration. I am
nothing, better than a poor or fallible man myself. But if I have made up my
mind on any point it is this--that there is no truth which demands such plain
speaking, as truth about the Lord's Supper.